They’ve always been like this

“During a congressional committee hearing in the late 1960s, as a Census Bureau official told it, a congressman was questioning statisticians from the bureau about the projected scope and costs of the 1970 census. The tenor of his questions was highly critical. Why did the bureau need to ask so many questions? Did not the projected questions constitute an invasion of individual privacy by the government? And why did the census cost so much?

Bureau officials responded patiently to each question, although it was clear that the congressman was unconvinced. Why did the federal government have to get so involved in collecting statistics in the first place, the congressman asked. After all, he continued, whenever he needed statistical information, he just went and looked it up in an almanac.”

– quoted from The American Census: A Social History,
by Margo J. Anderson, 1988

Giant government program that serves millions can’t meet its pension obligations

I received a copy of one of my specialty magazines today, MAIL.

There are two headlines on the cover:

USPS To Discount First-Class Mail 20% To Boost Volumes

and

Post Will Default on Retiree Payment to U.S.Treasury

About the first – I doubt that the bulk use of First-class mail is all that sensitive to price-discounting. The program will only be available to mailers who mailed 500,000 or more pieces in the fourth quarter of each of the past two years. Not going to affect me (or Greenleaf Press), I can assure you.

The 2nd headline is more disturbing. Postal Service retirees have their healthcare covered by the US Government. The Postal Service is obligated to fund the cost of its retiree’s healthcare. Their obligation for September 30, 2009 is to pay $5.4 billion to the US Treasury in order to pay those healthcare expenses. They don’t have the cash. Guess who will wind up paying the expenses? The taxpayers of the United States.

Why does anyone believe that a federal government can figure out how to run the entire healthcare sector of the economy? They can’t figure out how to pay for the healthcare of retired postal workers?

That “dead orthodoxy” is pulsating with life

In no branch of science would there be any real advance if every generation started fresh with no dependence upon what past generations have achieved. Yet in theology, vituperation of the past seems to be thought essential to progress. And upon what base slanders the vituperation is based! After listening to modern tirades against the great creeds of the Church, one receives rather a shock when one turns to the Westminster Confession, for example, or to that tenderest and most theological of books, the “Pilgrim’s Progress” of John Bunyan, and discovers that in doing so one has turned from shallow modern phrases to a “dead orthodoxy” that is pulsating with life in every word. In such orthodoxy there is life enough to set the whole world aglow with Christian love.

– J. Gresham Machen, Christianity and Liberalism, 1923

Admiring Jesus is not the same as having Faith in Jesus

The truth is that when men speak of trust in Jesus’ Person, as being possible without acceptance of the message of His death and resurrection, they do not really mean trust at all. What they designate as trust is really admiration or reverence. They reverence Jesus as the supreme Person of all history and the supreme revealer of God. But trust can come only when the supreme Person extends His saving power to us. “He went about doing good,” “He spake words such as never man spake,” “He is the express image of God” – that is reverence; “He love me and gave Himself for me” – that is faith.

– J. Gresham Machen, Christianity and Liberalism, 1923 page 37

Public schools = the most perfect instrument of tyranny yet devised

A public-school system, if it means the providing of free education for those who desire it, is a noteworthy and beneficent achievement of modern times; but when once it becomes monopolistic it is the most perfect instrument of tyranny which has yet been devised. Freedom of thought in the middle ges was combated by the Inquisition, but the modern method is far more effective. Place the lives of children in their formative years, despite the convictions of their parents, under the intimate control of experts appointed by the state, force them then to attend schools where the higher aspirations of humanity are crushed out, and where the mind is filled with the materialism of the day, and it is difficult to see how even the remnants of liberty can subsist. Such a tyranny, supported as it is by a perverse technique used as the instrument in destroying human souls, is certainly far more dangerous than the crude tyrannies of the past, which despite their weapons of fire and sword permitted thought at least to be free.

– J. Gresham Machen, Christianity and Liberalism, 1923, page 12

Public schools = a soul-killing system

In the state of Oregon, on Election Day, 1922, a law was passed by referendum vote in accordance with which all children in the state are required to attend the public schools. Christian schools and private schools, at least in the all-important lower grades, are thus wiped out of existence. Such laws, which if the present temper of the people prevails will probably soon be extended far beyond the bounds of one state, mean of course the ultimate destruction of all real education. When one considers what the public schools of America in many places already are – in their materialism, their discouragement of any sustained intellectual effort, their encouragement of the dangerous pseudo-scientific fads of experimental psychology – one can only be appalled by the thought of a commonwealth in which there is no escape from such a soul-killing system.

– J. Gresham Machen, Christianity and Liberalism, 1923, pages 10-11

Homeschool: An American History

I’m re-reading Prof. Milton Gaither’s intriguing book Homeschool: An American History which takes on the ambitious task of describing the history of homeschooling in the United States. I’ve decided it’s actually three separate books.

Part One is the history of colonial and 19th century education – which was largely conducted at home by parents. But there were no ideological overtones to these activities. It was the norm. The innovation in American education came with the public school movement which gathered steam after the civil war and succeeded in replacing at-home education with compulsory attendance at government schools by 1920.

Part Two is a tour-de-force summary of the cultural changes in America from 1920 to 1970 with a focus on their impact on the family (or was it the changes in the family which caused the cultural changes?). Gaither has a clear thesis and an excellent grasp of both the intellectual trends and cultural indicators of 20th century popular, suburban culture. His chapter is modestly titled “Why Homeschooling Happened, 1945-1990” but he is cataloging cultural trends with implications and effects far beyond homeschooling. As one who grew up in those turbulent years, I must say that his analysis rings true.

Part Three is a retelling of the modern homeschooling movement. He begins with John Holt, Raymond Moore, and Rousas Rushdooney and describes their ideas and the impact that they had. In the following chapters he picks up the threads of a second generation of leaders including Paul Lindstrom (Christian Liberty Academy), Gregg Harris, and Bill Gothard. He talks about the origins of the textbooks published by ACE, Bob Jones, and A Beka. He describes the influential roles played by Mary Pride and Cathy Duffy as curriculum reviewers in the 1980s. He catalogs the explosion of magazines and newsletters. And he tells the story of the founding and explosive growth of HSLDA. Gaither is not writing to simply praise all of the people and organizations who played a part in the modern homeschooling movement. He discusses the controversies and the charges leveled by critics as well. I’ll admit, some parts of the narrative made me squirm – but on the whole, I’d have to pronounce his treatment as the closest to a fair, balanced, objective account as I’ve read.

As a historian, the most interesting part of the book for me was Gaither’s analysis of why homeschooling happened. This is a level of analysis that takes a step back from describing what happened and his ideas are provocative. I concur in part and dissent in part. Here’s what he says:

First – the counter-cultural sensibility became the American sensibility. By 1970 both the left and the right had become profoundly disenchanted with government institutions. Their reasons were different, but their distrust was shared.

Second – suburbanization. Suburbanization de-populated the central cities and tended to sort the population by race, income level, age, and cultural style. The suburbs then supported, reinforced, and bred a sense of privacy, autonomy, and libertarianism. [I would argue that this is a bit of post hoc, propter hoc. I suspect that the American psyche was already dominated by ideas of privacy, autonomy and libertarianism and this fed suburbanization, not the other way around!]

Third – the American cult of the child. We love our children. ’nuff said.

Fourth – alienation of familes from the large, impersonal, unaccountable government monopoly schools. I might have pumped that phrasing up just a bit, but I think this is essentially what he is saying. cf. Gatto to get overwhelming confirmation of this!

For those who are interested in how we got here, set in the broader context of a history of education in America, this is a book I highly recommend. Available on Amazon by clicking here: Homeschool: An American History

– Rob Shearer

PS: Prof Gaither has a blog titled Homeschooling Research Notes which is updated several times each month. If you’re interested in homeschooling, it’s worth subscribing to and reading.

How the World’s Poorest People are Educating Themselves

Answer: With free-market entrepreneurial private schools.

I’ve just finished reading this most remarkable book: The Beautiful Tree – A personal journey into how the world’s poorest people are educating themselves. Fresh out of college in 1983, James Tooley went to Zimbabwe to teach school. Now, 26 years later, with an astonishing breadth of experience teaching and researching education in Africa, India, and China he presents startling data on successful educational innovation occurring in the poorest communities in India, Kenya, Zimbabwe, Ghana, and China – private schools created by the poor and serving poor students.

Prof. Tooley chronicles the abysmal failures of government education (40% teacher absenteeism, corruption, overcrowding, prejudice against the poor among other appalling indicators) and what the poorest communities are doing to secure an education for their children. It turns out that even in the poorest communities, parents value education and are willing to pay for it. Remarkably enough, they prefer to make arrangements where they can hold schools and teachers accountable. They have no way to do this politically with government schools, so they are turning to private schools. They are started many times by parents themselves or by a homegrown teacher in the community who is asked by the parents to teach their children. These schools are often unlicensed, un-recognized, and unaccredited, but nonetheless are doing a better job at educating the children of the poor than the government schools.

Tooley argues that this is NOT a bad thing – instead it should be nurtured, supported, and encouraged. He’s put his money where his mouth is and now heads a corporation which is seeking to invest in and develop a sort of franchise, recognized brand in affordable, community-focused private schools which serve the poor.

The most powerful part of his analysis is the clear and convincing data which he uses to show the large numbers of poor students already enrolled in private schools and documents their achievement. He catalogs the typical objections raised to private schooling and rebuts each of them convincingly. Rather than spending more and more foreign aid on government schools, he suggests that far better results would be achieved re-directing that aid to assist private schools that actually serve the poor – in the form of loans, direct grants for capital improvements, and targeted tuition support for the poorest of the poor.

Everyone involved in the public policy debates about education should read this book.

– Rob Shearer

Handwriting by George – 110 Rules

Handwriting by George 4packRules of Civility & Decent Behaviour in Company & Conversation.

Greenleaf Press is very pleased to announce that all four volumes in this series are now in print and available!

When George Washington was sixteen years old, he began copying 110 maxims for polite behavior into his schoolbooks. These rules describe the behavior of a gentleman, and many claim that they greatly influenced Washington’s attitudes and standards for his own behavior.

One day, when we were all tired of the standard handwriting practice book copy material, we began using Washington’s Rules as copy work. While many of them have obvious application to the eighteenth century, they also have a lot to say to modern gentlemen and ladies.

We hadn’t expected to enjoy these sayings as much as we did. They rarely stayed merely copywork exercise but became the basis of other discussions. “Show nothing to your friend that might affright him,” had immediate application. Other rules addressed putting others first and self last – and other ways to show respect to those around us.

Something special happens when children write these rules out for themselves.

Each volume contains 27 or 28 rules, with space to copy and illustrate each one. Practice for children learning to write, and spark discussion about “civil and decent behavior.”

Each is a paperback, 64 pages and intended for use in grades 1-3

188251436XVolume 1 contains such intriguing rules as:
Rule 4: “In the presence of others sing not to yourself with a humming noise nor drum with your fingers or feet.

Volume 2 contains such intriguing rules as:
Rule 40: “Strive not with your superiors in argument, but always submit your argument to others with modesty.”

1882514394Volume 3 contains such intriguing rules as:
Rule 70: “Reprehend not the imperfections of others for that belongs to Parents, Masters, and Superiors.

Volume 4 contains such intriguing rules as:
Rule 89: “Speak not Evil of the absent for it is unjust.

You can order all four volumes for a discount package price of $32.95 (a 10% discount – $36.95 if purchased separately). Or, if you already have volume one and now want to get the other three, you can get a discount price of $26.50 for volumes 2, 3, & 4 (a 10% discount – $29.85 if purchased separately).

Two birds with one stone – handwriting practice and character building!

– Rob Shearer
Publisher, Greenleaf Press

The Director's Blog – Rob Shearer, Francis Schaeffer Study Center, Mt. Juliet, TN